(Self-portrait on Love Wins shot at the library.)
Read Love Wins twice last weekend. Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed it. First, it’s worth mentioning that the debate should be more accurately centered on the tenets of inclusivism (which C.S. Lewis also promoted) instead of universalism. That being said, I don’t think the book merits all the vitriol it’s receiving.
Love Wins present great points, insights, and questions for those who both agree and disagree with inclusivism. I think the controversy surrounding the book epitomizes the polarization of our community in modern America. The pervading “us vs. them” mentality is toxic. It’s sad to witness the judgment and derision directed at those asking valid questions seeking to find truth. What does judgment accomplish? Moreover, do we even have the right? Are we allowed to have differing opinions and disagree with each other? Is ecumenicism dead?
It seems Bell’s main intent is to remind us of essential truths, some alternative thought processes, and a beautiful picture of possibility. He doesn’t validate his opinions as absolutes and I think that’s key.
I usually stay away from adding to the noise on the internets regarding controversial topics, but with the overwhelming voices (of what I find to be unfounded hate) I thought I might be able to offer a more even perspective. I think it’s important to read the book first.
Either way, I’m happy this book has people talking (I just wish it was a bit more pleasant and respectful). It lit a fire surrounding a topic difficult for everyone to process and it makes for some great conversation and discussion regardless of where you stand. Plus, thoughtful conversation for some reason always make beer taste a tad better (unless of course you’re drinking Bud Light/Miller Light/Keystone etc…because nothing can really make those taste better). :)
